Nuclear industry and climate change aussie NGOs joint statment

 

http://www.wilderness.org.au/campaigns/policy/joint_groups_nuclear_climate_change2  

 

Joint Australian Environment Groups communique on the nuclear industry and climate change

Media Statement
8 May, 2006

  1. The Australian non-government environment sector is united
    in its opposition to all aspects of the nuclear industry including
    uranium mining, uranium enrichment, nuclear power, nuclear weapons and
    the creation and disposal of radioactive waste.
  2. Every aspect of the nuclear industry is dirty, dangerous and
    enormously costly to workers and communities; to the environment and
    future generations; as well as financially. There are no adequate
    safeguards to prevent nuclear proliferation, or to contain radioactive
    waste for the thousands of years required, or to prevent the use of
    nuclear facilities and materials as terrorism targets.
  3. The Australian non-government environment sector reaffirms its
    considered conclusion that nuclear power offers no solution to the
    unfolding global warming crisis. The nuclear industry and some
    politicians have seized on climate change to try to resuscitate the
    nuclear industry, but are ignoring fatal flaws inherent in nuclear
    energy that rule it out as an effective or ethically acceptable
    response. By continuing to hold up nuclear as an effective response to
    global warming, proponents merely distract attention and resources away
    from existing effective, safe and affordable solutions to rising
    greenhouse emissions and consequent climate change.
  4. The Australian non-government environment sector calls on all
    political parties to reject uranium mining, nuclear reactors, nuclear
    weapons and radioactive waste dumps in Australia and to work towards
    their elimination globally. The creation of more high-level radioactive
    waste must cease and existing stockpiles must be stored as safely as
    possible in surface facilities close to the site of production.
  5. The Australian non-government environment sector calls on all
    political parties to seriously combat global warming by adopting
    policies in support of the rapid expansion of the renewable energy
    sector and a concerted Australia-wide program of energy efficiency.
    These programs and technologies should also be exported widely around
    the world to help other countries, especially developing nations.
  6. The Australian non-government environment sector acknowledges the
    strong and growing concern of the Australian community over global
    warming and the community's strong support for real measures to combat
    global warming, and commits to working with and for the community to
    ensure governments of all persuasions take responsible and timely
    action to prevent BOTH catastrophic climate change AND contamination of
    the planet by radioactive waste and nuclear weapons.

Signatories, 8 May, 2006:

The Wilderness Society
Australian Conservation Foundation
Greenpeace Australia-Pacific
Nature Conservation Council NSW
Total Environment Centre
Conservation Council of SA
Conservation Council of WA
Friends of the Earth
Environment Centre North Territory
AIDWATCH
Environs Kimberley
Conservation Council of the South East Region and Canberra
Queensland Conservation Council
Australian Toxics Network
Environment Victoria
Australian Marine Conservation Society

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Very timely post, of broad representation

Would be a good front page feature I think of international relevance in the current climate.

The groups here probably speak in a rough sense for maybe a million Australians or even more directly or indirectly. They are ngo, and not ostensibly party political and when you add the solid 10% Green Party political vote in a country of say 10 million voters with alot of overlap, that clearly is alot of people against the nuke industry. And why not? We quite like the notion of a clean green country and future, just by looking at what the rest of the world.

For PM Howard to say its hyprocritical to export uranium and not take the consequences is a bit like saying the drug dealer is stupid for not also being an addict. It's a bad thing to sell drugs true, but why be stupid as well? Australia can be stupid but can it really be that stupid to adopt the nuke addiction as well?

Time likely will tell, but two bites from the Howard mongrel on gst and IR could well be enough to teach even the most stupid swinging voter that dog bites hurt? I sure do hope so. Lets just hope same voter dupes have not got rabies from the earlier bites.

Way to go, champ.

Just keep right on calling the voters "stupid" and "dupes" because they don't agree with your own opinions.

That sort of elitist, hateful attitude will keep the Libs in government for another ten years. Well done! 

The dog's germs have bitten someone

Rabies anyone?

Irrefutable truths remain

Just a few of the many facts which remain:

 

  • There is no solution - after decades of the industry - for storing, let alone managing, nuclear wastes for the periods required.

 

  • Nuclear energy is a moot point with regards to climate change as uranium is a finite resource and would address electricity only - just one source of rising greenhouse gas emissions, ignoring industry, transport, agriculture and deforestation.

 

  • Uranium enrichment is highly energy intensive, with the USA even having two reactors to power an enrichment plant as art of the USEC (US Enrichment Corporation). Enrichment also being a major source of CFCs in the USA.

 

  • Nations such as Germany and Sweden are set to reduce their CO2 emissions far beyond Kyoto Protol standards whilst phasing out nuclear power.

 

  • US/India nuclear deals involve India retaining 8 reactors exclusively for military use, exempt from UN inspections.

 

  • Aust/China deals would involve Australian yellowcake first arriving at a military-run conversion plant, also exempt from IAEA Safeguards (disclosed in the Q&A of the signed Agreements).

 

  • Silex Systems Ltd's research into laser uranium enrichment, having now set an investment deal with General Electric, continues at Lucas Heights and is classified "Restricted Data" by the US and Australian governments due to the real weapons proliferation risks.

 

  • "Any country has the right to master these (nuclear) operations for civilian uses. But in doing so, it also masters the most difficult steps in making a nuclear bomb."

    - Head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, in his speech accepting the Nobel peace prize.

www.indymedia.org

Indymedia is a collective of independent media organizations and hundreds of journalists offering grassroots, non-corporate coverage. Indymedia is a democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of truth.

Oceania

Projects

Africa

Canada

East Asia

Europe

 

Latin America

South Asia

United States

 

West Asia

Topics

Process