Outside View: Nuclear Cancer Factories
Two thousand years ago Hippocrates laid down the dictum "primum non nocere," or "first, do no harm", meaning it's a physician's moral duty to induce no harm or injury to the patient in the course of treatment.
by Helen Caldicott
Outside View Contributor
Melbourne (UPI) Jul 12, 2005
Yet, certain ill-informed public figures and business leaders ignorant of the basics of biological science and genetics, who are prescribing the use of nuclear power to inoculate the world against the potential calamitous consequences of global warming, are instead violating Hippocrates' dictum at a profound level. Nuclear power will, without doubt, induce harm to global public health in a massive way and over generations.
A standard 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactor contains the equivalent radiation to that released by the explosion of 1,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs. The electricity generated comes at the expense of the production of that radiation. Indisputably however, radiation induces cancer and genetic disease by causing the mutation of genes.
Children and the elderly are 10 to 20 times more sensitive to the effects of radiation than others. The incubation time -- that is, the time between exposure and the manifestation of symptoms -- for cancer is five to 60 years; no tumor, though, appears with a "caused by" sign attached. Furthermore, the effects of radiation are cumulative. Each dose received adds to the risk of developing cancer or producing genetic disease in the offspring of those exposed to it. That's why we advise people not to have more medical or dental X-rays than are absolutely necessary
Yet nuclear power plants routinely discharge millions of curies of radioactive elements into the air and water. The so-called" noble" gases -- krypton, xenon and argon -- are readily absorbed by humans through the lung and deposit in the abdominal fat pad and upper thighs, where they irradiate the testicles and ovaries with high-energy gamma radiation. Tritium, radioactive hydrogen, is also routinely released.
Tritiated water is absorbed directly through the skin, lung and digestive tract and is incorporated directly into the gene where it is mutagenic and carcinogenic. People living near nuclear power plants are exposed through routine and accidental releases to these carcinogens and others, and there are plenty of studies in the peer-reviewed medical literature which show that in the areas surrounding older nuclear reactors in the United States there have been increased incidences of malignancies of various kinds.
Then there is nuclear waste.
Each year some 30 tons of thermally, radioactively-hot nuclear waste, laced with highly radioactive elements, are removed from every standard 1000 megawatt reactor and stored in cooling pools, awaiting final disposal.
Radioactive elements are tasteless, odorless and invisible. When they enter the environment they concentrate thousands of time at each step of the food chain -- in an aquatic environment in algae, crustaceans, and fish small and large; and on land - in grass, milk and meat.
These elements also include radioactive iodine which concentrates in leafy vegetables and milk and when ingested migrates to the thyroid gland where it causes cancer. In Berarus, near Chernobyl, over 2,000 children since the reactor melted down in 1989 have had their thyroids removed because of cancer, a situation unheard of in medical history.
Then there is Strontium 90, which concentrates in milk (including human breast milk) and can induce bone cancer and leukemia; Cesium 137, which concentrates in meat and induces a malignant muscle cancer called rhabdomyosarcoma; and Plutonium, named after the god of hell, which is so carcinogenic that 1-millionth of a gram causes cancer. Each reactor makes over 440 pounds of plutonium a year. Handled like iron by the body, it causes lung cancer, liver cancer, bone cancer and leukemia, and it crosses the placenta where, like thalidomide, it can damage a genetically normal embryo. It also has a predilection for the testicle, so that every male in the Northern Hemisphere carries a small load of plutonium in his testicles from weapons-testing days.
Eighty thousand tons of this high-level waste, which remains radioactive from hundreds to tens of thousands of years, sits in inadequately protected cooling pools throughout the United States, while huge quantities also accrue at reactor sites in France, Japan, Germany, and other countries.
The simple truth is that high-level waste will contaminate water and food over time, inducing epidemics of cancer and leukemia, particularly in children, while increasing the incidence of genetic diseases in future generations.
Prognosis: Nuclear reactors are potential cancer factories and we should not look to them to solve the problem of global warming.
Prescription: As a matter of public health policy, we should not be replacing one damaging technology with another that is even more damaging.
All rights reserved. Copyright 2005 by United Press International.
www.terradaily.com/news/oped-05zo.html
add your comments
Here here
by Hillel Freedman Tuesday June 06, 2006 at 02:56 PM
hillelfreedman@optusnet.com.au 0417506150
NUCLEAR POWER NO SOLUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE PUBLIC MEETING
MONDAY JULY 3RD @TRADES HALL 6:30PM Corner Lygon & Victoria Streets Carlton
Keynote Speaker Helen Caldicott launching her latest book on this topic. The single most articulate and passionate advocate of citizen action to remedy the nuclear and environmental crises, Dr Helen Caldicott, has devoted the last 35 years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop environmental destruction. Other speakers: Hillel Freedman Nuclear Free Australia Jacob Grech Organised by Nuclear Free Australia http://www.nukefreeaus.org and Melbourne University Press http://www.mup.unimelb.edu.au
Nuclear Power is not the Answer to Global Warming or Anything Else
Dr Helen Caldicott
Melbourne University Press $24.95 Publication/embargo date: 3 July 2006
‘Helen Caldicott has been my inspiration to speak out.' — Meryl Streep
‘In a world where dark and dangerous forces are threatening our planet, Helen Caldicott shines a powerful light. This much-needed book reveals truths that confirm we must take positive action now if we are to make a difference. – Martin Sheen
In a world torn apart by wars over oil, politicians have begun to look for alternative energy sources, and their leading choice is nuclear energy.
In this revealing examination of the costs and consequences of nuclear energy, world-renowned antinuclear spokesperson Helen Caldicott debunks the myths that belie the nuclear industry propaganda: she supplies evidence to show that nuclear power contributes to global warming; that the true cost of nuclear power is prohibitive, with taxpayers picking up most of the tab; that there's simply not enough uranium in the world to sustain nuclear power over the long term; and the potential for a catastrophic accident or a terrorist attack far outweighs any benefits.
Trained as a physician, the bestselling author of Nuclear Madness and Missile Envy here turns her attention from nuclear bombs to nuclear lightbulbs. As she makes meticulously clear in this essential book, the world cannot withstand either.
The world's leading spokesperson for the antinuclear movement, Dr Helen Caldicott is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, the recipient of the 2003 Lannan Prize for Cultural Freedom and the inaugural Australian Peace Prize awarded by the Peace Organisation of Australia, 2006. A medical doctor, she has devoted the past thirty-five years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age. Dr Caldicott is a bestselling author and divides her time between the central coast of New South Wales and Washington, DC, where she is President of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute
www.nukefreeaus.org













John's Political Harp
John Howard is playing the political harp like he always has.
He will put a wedge issue in the policy bill that he does not really care about and is prepared to lose to distract the opposition while he slips in the policies he really wants.
The Nuclear debate has begun and these political tactics are in play already.
If he can get the public to argue over the merits of nuclear power stations, which he knows we will not accept, then he gets the opportunity to include uranium enrichment for export and Fee paying nuclear waste dumps in the same bill without debate.
Example: The first question the apposition asked is "where are the power stations going to be?" as if it was a forgone conclusion that we WILL have nuclear power. Watch the passionate debate about the trivia while the really dangerous issues are ignored.
At the end of the bun fight all Johnny has to do is concede a bit and say "OK, we won't have nuclear power but we will have the rest of it, which is all he wants anyway. The giveaway line has already been heard in John Howard's quote "I think nuclear power is inevitable, but we need a debate"...........................whats to debate about the inevitable?
We need to pay attention this time, as we cannot let this one slip out of our control........or we will end up living in a Nuclear waste zone, while Johnny and crew more to South America.
This article was researched by monkeys
The reason the greens are going to lost the nuclear debate is by pushing articles such as these. Reactors emit radioactive elements into the atmosphere? Not through those cooling towers that emit only water vapour. Although if you're thinking of coal power stations you'd be utterly correct. What is this crap.
see my comments though on radon gas at U mines
which does flow freely into the environment, is cancer causing, and is a nasty little secret of the nuke industry
I hadn't until I did some background before helping up at Jabiluka. It's naturally occuring gas in the rock matrix of uranium oxide. It's invisible, tastless, colourless, AND heavier than air. Think about that a moment. It drifts along the troughs and dips. It kills yer too.
Amazing to think the Aborigines called the land up there where uranium ore occurs "sickness country" for thousands of years before anyone invented the periodic table.
That's what radon gas does, more here at the US EPA web site
http://www.epa.gov/radon/
and closer to home
http://forum.serioussticks.com/viewtopic.php?p=1379&sid=2e506182b736c57ace28c9bfa5c3cc16
So you see mining uranium is an occupational health problem too. A serious one just like coal can be.