Forestry’s Climate Change Contribution Visible For All To See And Breathe

tassie burns

A weekend of statewide smoke haze from annual forestry burn-offs has left a sour taste in the mouths of many Tasmanians and continued the logging industry’s massive contribution to annual greenhouse gas emissions.

Claims by the logging industry that the burns ‘mimic nature’ and are a necessary part of the regeneration of forests ignores scientific evidence and snubs the overwhelming community desire to see and end to the logging of oldgrowth and high conservation-value forests.

“Many of the areas the industry is currently burning are so precious that they should not have been logged at all,” said Vica Bayley, spokesperson for The Wilderness Society. “They were once habitat for endangered animals, an important protector of domestic water catchments, and massive stores of carbon, collected from the atmosphere over centuries and safely stored by the intact forest.”

Industry claims that clearfelling and burning of native forest mimics nature directly contradict scientific evidence. A 2003 study looked at the carbon stored in forest soils and analysed the carbon loss after a natural bushfire event and the loss after logging and burning.

Dean, C., Mackey, B.G., and Roxburgh, S.H. (2003), Growth Modelling of Eucalyptus regnans for carbon accounting at the landscape scale, In: Amaro, A., Reed, D., Soares, P. (eds.), Modelling Forest systems, CABI Publishing, Walliford, U.K The results are below.

Forest status Soil carbon stored
Unlogged:

670 tonnes per ha

Natural stand fire: 654 tonnes per ha
(16 tonnes or 2.4% lost)
Harvested: 97 tonnes per ha
(573 tonnes or 85% lost)

“Nature doesn’t clearfell an area, leave it to dry out for a summer and then artificially ignite it to create a high intensity burn,” continued Mr Bayley.

“Forestry Tasmania’s own figures show that over 13 years to 2020, logging will release at least 26% of the carbon stored in the commercial forests they manage—that’s 13 million tonnes from state forests. Only when they reduce logging will the carbon balance begin to recover.”  

“Protecting forests is the quickest, cheapest and easiest way to begin the fight against climate change,” concluded Mr Bayley.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Polluting Tasmania

A brilliant article - there should be more publicity in the newspapers, over the radio and television - to inform the general public and the issue should be actively included in our school curriculums. 

 


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Add image
  • Allowed HTML tags: <img> <p> <b> <i> <a> <br> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <u> <del> <sup> <sub> <hr> <div><h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <pre> <table> <tr> <td>
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
Syndicate content

www.indymedia.org

Indymedia is a collective of independent media organizations and hundreds of journalists offering grassroots, non-corporate coverage. Indymedia is a democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of truth.

Oceania

Projects

Africa

Canada

East Asia

Europe

 

Latin America

South Asia

United States

 

West Asia

Topics

Process