Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
A call by the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) to all who care about fairness and decency in this country and especially to all those presenting themselves as left wing or progressive.
Fellow Workers
As you might have heard a group of politicos (the Revolutionary Socialist Party) (recently split, we are informed, from the Democratic Socialist Party) have taken it upon themselves to expropriate without consultation or compensation, the title of our paper "Direct Action." This was the paper started by the IWW in world war one and brutally suppressed by the government then, restarted by the IWW in the late 1920's and published by the IWW in several editions from 1990.
In this publication of theirs, that they are calling Direct Action, the RSP make reference to the IWW in the past tense only. They make no reference whatsoever to the editions of Direct Action after 1990. This is particularly dishonest because I wrote to them before publication commenced reminding them of our existence and the fact that we maintain ownership of the title "Direct Action".
This ownership is given to us not by some legalistic copyright but by the persecution, imprisonment and deportation of the members of our organisation in Australia; working men and women who worked for their class; who fought to build a paper to educate that class, to organise it and to put it on the path to emancipation.
Basically the RSP show themselves as thieves prepared to steal any title not nailed down by some form of bourgeois copyright.
The IWW in Australia has a long history. Some of our members might have been irascible and belligerent. We have had our ideas and we have fought for them and defended them against all comers. But whenever solidarity was called for, whenever a just cause or an under-dog was struggling then we have been there. In recent years we have remained a small group and one lacking in resources but this should not mean that basic principles of fair play and solidarity should be trampled underfoot in this way.
I suggest everyone reading this write expressing their outrage at this thievery to:
- Editor: Doug Lorimer - editorial@directaction.org.au
- Assistant editor: Allen Myers
- Design/layout: Dani Barley, Kathy Newnam - layout@directaction.org.au
- Website manager: Jorge Jorquera webmanager@directaction.org.au
- Subscriptions manager: Marce Cameron - subs@directaction.org.au
and let them know what you think of them.
This situation is especially ironically because, in the debate between those advocating direct as against political action (which is as old as the organised working class movement), the RSP like the DSP it split from is a political outfit. They do not believe in direct action as a means of effecting change. They believe in political action which is why they have always been putting people up for elections, telling us to vote labor and giving their support to all those third world governments. Really they should call their publication "Action mediated by the State and the Party" that at least would be honest. To call it Direct Action is a manifestation of the dishonesty of the leadership of this organisation which, given its youth, does not bode well for its future integrity. We call upon the rank and file membership of the RSP (if there are any such) to make their voices heard against this injustice.
In solidarity
Miek - (Sec,Treas AusROC)
- 426 reads













Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
This is a shame, really, that yet another bunch of labour fakirs are trying to raise the snake from the bottle with a merry tune. The tune they're playing is direct action, now, I'm not going to hold that against them. The more actual direct action we see, the better. I just want to see some from this group.
But why do they have to omit a bunch of history? And, seriously, why not just have a little chat with the IWW and say, "We like that name so much, we'd like to use it on our paper, we've noticed you aren't using it just now?" In the comradely way that people borrow or give away televisions, or bookshelves, or bedframes they aren't using.
Its a sad sign when you have to knick off your mates what they'd more than likely give you anyway.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
Thanks anonymous
Actually though the IWW is still publishing Direct Action (with the exception of this year when we have run into the sort temporary problems that small groups sometimes do). Nor do we intend to stop publishing Direct Action because a bunch of trots can't think up a name for their paper by themselves.
Absolutely true that the thing about direct action is that working people need to take more of it. Chance would be a fine thing in this particular instance.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
Direct Action was the name of Green Left Weekly before it became GLW. I guess they're just reverting back to that. But then again, why miss an opportunity to instigate pointless online infighting? That's about as direct action as it gets.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
The complaint is more that Direct Action is currently in use by the IWW, andthat DSP/RSP is cashing in (again) on someone else's radicalism.
Like, if you're so fucking rad, get your own cred.
--
Power to the sistas and therefore to the class
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
So in the 90s were the IWW cashing in on DSP radicalism since the DSP used the name Direct Action in the 80s?
And from the looks of the article IWW only sporadically used the title in the 90s. It's 2008! Get over it.
It's just more pointless infighting from obscure left grouplets. And just so no ones confused, the DSP and RSP are included in that.
ohhh so radical !
when u have achieved something then you can call yourself radical.
as the man says, pointless catfight and bywords, cred and rad that achieves nothing
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"! - a history lesson
The only time the SWP's direct action ever had any publicity was in 1982. In that year Unionists, left wingers of all stripes, even Labor MPs condemned it for giving support to the Ustasha. In that year the SWP went over to the dark side by giving succour to the pro-Nazi "Croatian Socialist Party". Don't believe me? Just go to the mitchell library and read their papers!
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"! - a history lesson
Wooo! Yeah! Lets get into beefs about shit decades old no one remembers!
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"! - a history lesson
So collaboration with fascists is okay because of time passing. ... interesting.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"! - a history lesson
No, that is a straw argument. I did not say that time passing made collaboration with fascists acceptable. Obviously it does not. I merely implied that the usefulness of bringing up a decade old beef with little to no relevance to any current political activism seems pointless.
The original point of the post about the name 'Direct Action' is hardly worth mentioning. I would assume that the reason that the RSP is using that name is because that was what Green Left Weekly was called before it was the Green Left Weekly. From what I under stand, when it was Direct Action it was more internally focused, had more of an explicitly Marxist flavour. The shift in the 90s to GLW was an attempt to present a more mainstream publication. The split between the RSP and the DSP was over the RSP claiming that the DSP had deviated to much from a Marxist tradition. So it seems to me reverting back to Direct Action is an attempt to say this is a re-birth of our old paper. Personal I think this whole thing is a case of something which is pretty prevalent in the left. It's certainly has been in the DSP, is probably in the RSP and seems like it's in the IWW. And that's obscure little grouplets over estimating their impact on the world. The number of people who even know what the IWW version of Direct Action is, is probably miniscule. What ever that number is, it’s probably comparable with the number of people who remember when Green Left Weekly was called Direct Action. The amount of uber-cool oh-so-radical “cred” that is attached to either publication is no doubt so insignificant that only bored leftists would bother debating it.
So you sent the RSP a letter and they didn’t respond. Fine. That’s a bit rude. But my guess is they thought “Fuck it. We have as much claim to the title, since our paper used to be called Direct Action, (it’s a fairly generic activist term any way) and no matter what we say, it’s going to be painted as evil “trots” steal words, so we’ll just ignore it.” And by the looks of the responses on this site it was good idea. Seems like people where just looking for an opening for a DSP/RSP pile-on, so every disgruntled radical can air their grudge no matter how ancient or inane.I’m not a member of the DSP or RSP. I think their internal structures stifle activism, I think their (along with everyone elses) focus on selling papers is silly. But I can tell the difference between a legitimate criticism, and people complaining for something to do.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
does anyone even buy this crap?
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
There's absolutely no way the RSP is going to abandon the name Direct Action just because the IWW happens to have published a zine with the same title, whether currently (early '90s--) or in the past. Indeed, just as the RSP fails to acknowledge the existence of the IWW publication -- let alone their use of its title -- it also fails to acknowledge the existence of the IWW itself; a fault shared by all of their (neo-)Trotskyist competitors (DSP, SAlt, SP, A3I). Still, obtaining an official statement from the group regarding its use of the name -- "bad luck" -- is possible, if not likely.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
The New people on the block should respect the traditon of the IWW. They have won the right to the name over many generations. Middle Class yuppies like the RSP show no respect to the traditions of working class struggle. Groups like the RSP and DSP are corporations, not workers organisations. BOYCOTT THE RSP
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
I am amazed this bitchfest gets top billing at sydney indymedia....but thats the quality of the place
there wont be donations coming from me thats for sure
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
Yeah, no shit. I find it hard to believe this is the most pressing issue facing Sydney's activist community.
Re: Hands OFF "Direct Action"!
Post new comment