Industrial Relations Commission Rejects Val Kerrison's Application to Reopen her Case
Justices Staunton, Staff and Walton have refused to grant Val Kerrison permission to re-open her case in the Industrial Relations Commission of N.S.W.
Val made an application on the grounds that the IRC in its previous decision failed to take into account the anti discrimination laws which it must do. There was also no procedural fairness.
Looking disinterested and evidently already having made their minds up to throw the application out before the case was presented, the three judges happily took their cue from TAFE and HealthQuest representatives Ms Elaine Brus and Mr P. Menzies QC. They knew it was a foregone conclusion and had barely any enthusiasm themselves.
Justice Walton, vice president of the IRC, was formerly a barrister retained by the Police Association. In their dealings with HealthQuest, the government medical office which issued a fraudulent retirement certificate to Mrs Kerrison, many public servants and teachers have found their unions to be their worst enemies and to have betrayed them. This is because of the unions' relationship with the state Labor government. There is a conflict of interest when a union member takes on the government.
Justice Staunton was formerly head of the Nurses Association and a State Labor M.P. before being appointed Chief Magistrate and then a judge in the I.R.C. How can a judge be unbiased with a history like that?
The Labor government's use of political psychiatry is disgusting and a blight on the nation. Yet none of these judges is going to stand up and say it is wrong and against all the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Instead they sit on their high horses making judgments against whistleblowers who have come up against the evil of HealthQuest after making complaints of corruption in the workplace.
See Cronyism in N.S.W. Courts:
http://www.wbde.org/documents/2006Dec4_ArticleCronyismIn_NSW_Courts_AntinoSantangelo.php
and also the website that exposes the documents in this terrible case:
http://wbde.org/
I am disgusted with the Industrial Relations Commission. Shame on them.
Deaf Justice
Val's Submissions to the court
The 'judges' do not have the power to deny Val Kerrison procedural fairness. Nor do any of the miscreants (HealthQuest sickos Gapper, Jagger, Mandel, Davison, and TAFE's Ramsey, Willmott, Walshaw, McGregor, Quinn, Peter Cribb etc)
Val has been asking for this SIMPLE basic human right for more than 10 years including in her application to IRC way back in 2000 and continuing through all those years including her application this year. http://www.wbde.org/documents/Application_to_Re-open_case_Submitted_9_February_2007.pdf and her reply to TAFE and Crown Sols (Cribb, Brus, Lye, Marino Rizzo, Salpeter, and other magg**ts in the trough) http://www.wbde.org/documents/Kerrison'sReplyToTAFE_Submi -
ssions_Submitted_13April2007.pdf
It is a pity the useless premiers Iemma and Carr, and the equally useless attorneys general - shaw and debus and Hatzistergos - did not suppoet honesty, decency and integrity like they seem to love the pedophile DZ who was almost knocked over by the Crown Solicitors team giving him all the procedural fairness in the land . John Adams wrote:
See more in John Adam's letter 5 October 2005 to ,
Seems that none of these men should be in public office - they are an insult to us and our standards
Jo Hewitt
reporter@wbde.org
What's honourable about them?
I don't see why these people have "The Hon" before their names. We have shown they are far from honourable.
That maybe the only way they can get some honor for themselves
To fool gullible people
if they were truly honorable it would show - even blind freddie would be able to see it.
but if the honor they crave isnt there already, well what can they do?
so they self-title themselves "your honor". bit like a shonky used car dealer loudly calling himself "honest john".
whereas the whistleblowers, with their integrity intact, stand tall in my honor ratings
the judges also sometimes wear wigs to try to make themselves look impressive.
then they perch up high to make people look up to them
and they wear nighties! black nighties!
but they call them robes
bit like harry potter actually - but harry has his own integrity and courage and all can see it.
perhaps we should take up a collection and purchase some little items for them with brave sounding names such as Gladiator and Rambo, and they come in exciting colours too.
Re: Val's Submissions to the court
Hi
One of the links above was too long to fit on the line so did not work when I clicked it. It should work smaller in future.Try
http://www.wbde.org/documents/Kerrison'sReplyToTAFE_Submissions_Submitted_13April2007.pdf
Procedural Fairness for judges and pedophiles!
Or is it pedophiles and judges?
not sure!
The advantages of being a judge or pedophile
the government don't want court cases around them - bit embarrassing really. And you can't be sure about your mates can you?
but court cases against the whistleblowers is good publicity for bullies at the top like Iemma and his thugs. Or blind howard and rudd.
None of these blindmen are standing beside our whistleblowers are they?
Lloyd Andrews
who else can she go to
what is the problem with these people. what about the workers?
Carl Sterry
What about the unions?
Their silence is deafening.
Teachers Federation filed then left Val to run it by herself
not an honest union lawyer in sight!
what happened to paul macmahon that filed the case
where is joanna macara the union lawyer?
Industrial Relations Comm Rejects Kerrison's Appl to Reopen
Val Kerrison's cases filed in the ADT are finally being allowed to be heard. They are the discrimination and victimising cases against TAFE (especially Ramsey and Willmott), and aiding and abetting cases against CSAH (HealthQuest) and NSW Health Dept (MAP) . Crown Solicitors and ADT put them off for years, but they are set down for hearing soon.
Keep an eye on WhistleBlowers' Documents Exposed
http://wbde.org
Jo
Post new comment